EFSA OIE WOHA UPDATES ON CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRP ZOONOSIS
CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION ZOONOSIS AND WHO MAKES THE CALL $$$
THE CODE COMMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED THE RATIONALE PROVIDED IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION’S FEBRUARY 2021 REPORT THAT CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR LISTING, SPECIFICALLY FOR POINT 2 OF ARTICLE 1.2.2. OF CHAPTER 1.2. CRITERIA FOR THE INCLUSION OF DISEASES, INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS IN THE OIE LIST
FROM: TERRY SINGELTARY <FLOUNDER9@VERIZON.NET>
SENT: 27 MAY 2022 19:37
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION
I CAN'T SEEM TO GET A REPLY?
''I WAS WONDERING IF CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION OF CERVID WILL BE ADDRESSED AT ALL AT THE OIE #89, AND IF SO, WHAT SESSION? ''
KIND REGARDS, TERRY
***> HOWEVER IT WAS DISCUSSED IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS BY THE SPECIALIST COMMISSION. THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2021 (PAGE 5)
HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
SNIP...END...TSS
REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE OIE TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION VIRTUAL MEETING, 7–16 & 23 SEPTEMBER 2021
SNIP...
THE CODE COMMISSION WAS PROVIDED WITH AN UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK TO DEVELOP CASE DEFINITIONS TO SUPPORT NOTIFICATION BEING CONDUCTED BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION. IN RESPONSE TO THIS UPDATE, THE CODE COMMISSION RECOGNISED THE VALUE OF THIS WORK AND REMINDED MEMBERS THAT IN ORDER TO SUPPORT NOTIFICATION, NEWLY DEVELOPED CASE DEFINITIONS OF LISTED DISEASES WOULD BE PUBLISHED ON THE OIE WEBSITE IF THEY DO NOT CONFLICT WITH EXISTING OIE STANDARDS. THESE CASE DEFINITIONS WOULD THEN BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN THE RELEVANT DISEASE-SPECIFIC CHAPTER OF THE TERRESTRIAL CODE ACCORDING TO THE PRIORITISATION OF THE CODE COMMISSION’S WORK PROGRAMME AND THE STANDARD-SETTING PROCESS.
THE CODE COMMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED THE RATIONALE PROVIDED IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION’S FEBRUARY 2021 REPORT THAT CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR LISTING, SPECIFICALLY FOR POINT 2 OF ARTICLE 1.2.2. OF CHAPTER 1.2. CRITERIA FOR THE INCLUSION OF DISEASES, INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS IN THE OIE LIST. THE COMMISSION ALSO NOTED THAT THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER THE EXPERT CONSULTATION REPORTS AND THE OPINION OF THE LABORATORIES COMMISSION ON ASSESSMENTS UNDERTAKEN FOR PARATUBERCULOSIS AND WEST NILE VIRUS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 1.2.
THE CODE COMMISSION WISHED TO THANK THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR ITS COLLABORATIVE WORK IN PROVIDING OPINIONS TO SUPPORT THE CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MEMBER COMMENTS RECEIVED. THE CODE COMMISSION REMINDED MEMBERS THAT ITS CONSIDERATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION CONTRIBUTIONS IS NOTED UNDER THE RELEVANT AGENDA ITEMS OF THIS REPORT AND ENCOURAGED MEMBERS TO READ THIS REPORT TOGETHER WITH THE SEPTEMBER 2021 SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION REPORT.
HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE OIE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR ANIMAL DISEASES VIRTUAL, 1–11 FEBRUARY 2021
IV) CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE
THE COMMISSION CONSIDERED THE REQUEST BY THE CODE COMMISSION FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE RATIONALE FOR THE COMMISSION’S OPINION THAT CWD DID NOT FULFIL THE CRITERIA FOR LISTING, SPECIFICALLY FOR POINT 2 OF ARTICLE 1.2.26 OF THE TERRESTRIAL CODE. THE COMMISSION EXPLAINED THAT THE OPINION WAS BASED ON AN EXTENSIVE CONSULTATION PROCESS THAT TOOK INTO ACCOUNT THE OPINIONS OF THE AD HOC GROUP ON BSE, THE WORKING GROUP ON WILDLIFE AND SEVERAL SUBJECT-MATTER EXPERT CONSULTATIONS. BASED ON THIS EXTENSIVE CONSULTATION, THE COMMISSION INDICATED THAT THE LOW DISEASE PREVALENCE, THE IMPRACTICAL NATURE OF CURRENTLY AVAILABLE DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, AND THE LIMITED NUMBER OF CONTROL MEASURES MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO ELIMINATE THE DISEASE OR SCIENTIFICALLY PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO DEMONSTRATE EITHER FREEDOM OR IMPENDING FREEDOM. THE COMMISSION CONSIDERED ALSO THAT DESPITE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMMES BY SOME MEMBERS, NO COUNTRY CAN CURRENTLY DEMONSTRATE EITHER FREEDOM OR IMPENDING FREEDOM FROM DISEASE.
ANNEX 19
WORK PROGRAMME OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR ANIMAL DISEASES (FEB 2021)
DEFINE A PROCEDURE FOR THE EVALUATION OF DISEASES AGAINST THE LISTING CRITERIA OF CHAPTER 1.2., AND RESPONDING TO REQUESTS FOR LISTING DECISIONS
EVALUATED PROPOSALS FOR (DE)LISTING OF:
• M. TUBERCULOSIS • INFESTATION OF HONEY BEES WITH ACARAPIS WOODI • INFESTATION OF HONEY BEES WITH TROPILAELAPS SPP.
• CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE
• ATYPICAL BSE
ON MONDAY, MAY 30, 2022 AT 10:35:20 AM CDT,
SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT> WROTE:
DEAR DR SINGELTARY,THANK YOU FOR YOUR MESSAGE, AND APOLOGIES FOR OUR RATHER TARDY RESPONSE.
BELOW IS THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUERY.
WE ARE HAPPY TO HELP SHOULD YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
CHEERS.
FROM: GREGORIO TORRES <G.TORRES@OIE.INT>
SENT: 30 MAY 2022 14:15
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>; SARA LINNANE <S.LINNANE@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION: CWD
HI CWD WAS NOT DISCUSSED THIS YEAR.
HOWEVER IT WAS DISCUSSED IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS BY THE SPECIALIST COMMISSION. THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2021 (PAGE 5) HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
FROM: TERRY SINGELTARY <FLOUNDER9@VERIZON.NET>
SENT: 27 MAY 2022 19:37
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION
I CAN'T SEEM TO GET A REPLY?
''I WAS WONDERING IF CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION OF CERVID WILL BE ADDRESSED AT ALL AT THE OIE #89, AND IF SO, WHAT SESSION? ''
KIND REGARDS, TERRY
***> HOWEVER IT WAS DISCUSSED IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS BY THE SPECIALIST COMMISSION. THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2021 (PAGE 5)
HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
SNIP...END...TSS
REPORT OF THE MEETING OF THE OIE TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION VIRTUAL MEETING, 7–16 & 23 SEPTEMBER 2021
SNIP...
THE CODE COMMISSION WAS PROVIDED WITH AN UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK TO DEVELOP CASE DEFINITIONS TO SUPPORT NOTIFICATION BEING CONDUCTED BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION. IN RESPONSE TO THIS UPDATE, THE CODE COMMISSION RECOGNISED THE VALUE OF THIS WORK AND REMINDED MEMBERS THAT IN ORDER TO SUPPORT NOTIFICATION, NEWLY DEVELOPED CASE DEFINITIONS OF LISTED DISEASES WOULD BE PUBLISHED ON THE OIE WEBSITE IF THEY DO NOT CONFLICT WITH EXISTING OIE STANDARDS. THESE CASE DEFINITIONS WOULD THEN BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN THE RELEVANT DISEASE-SPECIFIC CHAPTER OF THE TERRESTRIAL CODE ACCORDING TO THE PRIORITISATION OF THE CODE COMMISSION’S WORK PROGRAMME AND THE STANDARD-SETTING PROCESS.
THE CODE COMMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED THE RATIONALE PROVIDED IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION’S FEBRUARY 2021 REPORT THAT CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR LISTING, SPECIFICALLY FOR POINT 2 OF ARTICLE 1.2.2. OF CHAPTER 1.2. CRITERIA FOR THE INCLUSION OF DISEASES, INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS IN THE OIE LIST. THE COMMISSION ALSO NOTED THAT THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER THE EXPERT CONSULTATION REPORTS AND THE OPINION OF THE LABORATORIES COMMISSION ON ASSESSMENTS UNDERTAKEN FOR PARATUBERCULOSIS AND WEST NILE VIRUS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 1.2.
THE CODE COMMISSION WISHED TO THANK THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR ITS COLLABORATIVE WORK IN PROVIDING OPINIONS TO SUPPORT THE CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MEMBER COMMENTS RECEIVED. THE CODE COMMISSION REMINDED MEMBERS THAT ITS CONSIDERATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION CONTRIBUTIONS IS NOTED UNDER THE RELEVANT AGENDA ITEMS OF THIS REPORT AND ENCOURAGED MEMBERS TO READ THIS REPORT TOGETHER WITH THE SEPTEMBER 2021 SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION REPORT.
HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
THANK YOU FOR YOUR MESSAGE, AND APOLOGIES FOR OUR RATHER TARDY RESPONSE.
BELOW IS THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUERY.
WE ARE HAPPY TO HELP SHOULD YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
CHEERS.
FROM: GREGORIO TORRES <G.TORRES@OIE.INT>
SENT: 30 MAY 2022 14:15
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>; SARA LINNANE <S.LINNANE@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION: CWD
HI CWD WAS NOT DISCUSSED THIS YEAR.
HOWEVER IT WAS DISCUSSED IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS BY THE SPECIALIST COMMISSION. THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2021 (PAGE 5) HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
4.1. SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR ANIMAL DISEASES
THE OIE SECRETARIAT UPDATED THE CODE COMMISSION ON RELEVANT ONGOING ACTIVITIES OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION. THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION, AT ITS SEPTEMBER 2021 MEETING, WILL CONSIDER A NUMBER OF TOPICS RELEVANT TO THE CODE COMMISSION’S WORK PROGRAMME, AND WILL PROVIDE ITS OPINIONS ON A NUMBER OF POINTS REGARDING CHAPTER 8.14. INFECTION WITH RABIES VIRUS; CHAPTER 8.15. INFECTION WITH RIFT VALLEY FEVER VIRUS; CHAPTER 12.7. EQUINE PIROPLASMOSIS; AND CHAPTER 8.X. AND CHAPTER 12.3. ON SURRA AND DOURINE. THE CODE COMMISSION, AT ITS FEBRUARY 2022 MEETING, WILL CONSIDER THE OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION TOGETHER WITH OTHER PENDING ISSUES, IN ORDER TO PROGRESS WORK ON THE REVISION OF THESE CHAPTERS.
OIE TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL HEALTH STANDARDS COMMISSION/SEPTEMBER 2021
5
THE CODE COMMISSION WAS PROVIDED WITH AN UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK TO DEVELOP CASE DEFINITIONS TO SUPPORT NOTIFICATION BEING CONDUCTED BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION. IN RESPONSE TO THIS UPDATE, THE CODE COMMISSION RECOGNISED THE VALUE OF THIS WORK AND REMINDED MEMBERS THAT IN ORDER TO SUPPORT NOTIFICATION, NEWLY DEVELOPED CASE DEFINITIONS OF LISTED DISEASES WOULD BE PUBLISHED ON THE OIE WEBSITE IF THEY DO NOT CONFLICT WITH EXISTING OIE STANDARDS. THESE CASE DEFINITIONS WOULD THEN BE CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN THE RELEVANT DISEASE-SPECIFIC CHAPTER OF THE TERRESTRIAL CODE ACCORDING TO THE PRIORITISATION OF THE CODE COMMISSION’S WORK PROGRAMME AND THE STANDARD-SETTING PROCESS.
THE CODE COMMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED THE RATIONALE PROVIDED IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION’S FEBRUARY 2021 REPORT THAT CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE DOES NOT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR LISTING, SPECIFICALLY FOR POINT 2 OF ARTICLE 1.2.2. OF CHAPTER 1.2. CRITERIA FOR THE INCLUSION OF DISEASES, INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS IN THE OIE LIST. THE COMMISSION ALSO NOTED THAT THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER THE EXPERT CONSULTATION REPORTS AND THE OPINION OF THE LABORATORIES COMMISSION ON ASSESSMENTS UNDERTAKEN FOR PARATUBERCULOSIS AND WEST NILE VIRUS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 1.2.
THE CODE COMMISSION WISHED TO THANK THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR ITS COLLABORATIVE WORK IN PROVIDING OPINIONS TO SUPPORT THE CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MEMBER COMMENTS RECEIVED. THE CODE COMMISSION REMINDED MEMBERS THAT ITS CONSIDERATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION CONTRIBUTIONS IS NOTED UNDER THE RELEVANT AGENDA ITEMS OF THIS REPORT AND ENCOURAGED MEMBERS TO READ THIS REPORT TOGETHER WITH THE SEPTEMBER 2021 SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION REPORT.
TUESDAY, MAY 31, 2022
89TH GENERAL SESSION OF THE WORLD ASSEMBLY OF OIE DELEGATES FOR WOAH GENERAL SUMMIT 2022 CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION DISCUSSIONS AND CONCERNS
89TH GENERAL SESSION OF THE WORLD ASSEMBLY OF OIE DELEGATES FOR WOAH GENERAL SUMMIT 2022 CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION DISCUSSIONS AND CONCERNS
89TH GENERAL SESSION OF THE WORLD ASSEMBLY OF OIE DELEGATES FOR WOAH GENERAL SUMMIT FROM 23/05/2022 TO 26/05/2022 12:00PM - 4:30PM (GMT+1:00) PARIS
CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY TSE PRION PRP DISEASE, NO DISCUSSIONS OR CONCERNS AT 89TH GENERAL SESSION OF THE WORLD ASSEMBLY OF OIE DELEGATES FOR WOAH GENERAL SUMMIT FROM 23/05/2022 TO 26/05/2022...TERRY
FROM: GREGORIO TORRES <G.TORRES@OIE.INT>
SENT: 30 MAY 2022 14:15
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>; SARA LINNANE <S.LINNANE@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION: CWD
HI CWD WAS NOT DISCUSSED THIS YEAR.
HOWEVER IT WAS DISCUSSED IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS BY THE SPECIALIST COMMISSION. THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2021 (PAGE 5)
HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
FROM: TERRY SINGELTARY <FLOUNDER9@VERIZON.NET>
SENT: 27 MAY 2022 19:37
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION
I CAN'T SEEM TO GET A REPLY?
HTTPS://WOAHOIE.BLOGSPOT.COM/2022/05/89TH-GENERAL-SESSION-OF-WORLD-ASSEMBLY.HTML
89TH GENERAL SESSION OF THE WORLD ASSEMBLY OF OIE DELEGATES FOR WOAH GENERAL SUMMIT 2022 CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION DISCUSSIONS AND CONCERNS
FROM: GREGORIO TORRES <G.TORRES@OIE.INT>
SENT: 30 MAY 2022 14:15
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>; SARA LINNANE <S.LINNANE@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION: CWD
HI CWD WAS NOT DISCUSSED THIS YEAR.
HOWEVER IT WAS DISCUSSED IN SEVERAL OCCASIONS BY THE SPECIALIST COMMISSION. THE LAST DISCUSSION WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2021 (PAGE 5)
HTTPS://WWW.WOAH.ORG/APP/UPLOADS/2021/11/A-TAHSC-SEPT-2021-REPORT.PDF
FROM: TERRY SINGELTARY <FLOUNDER9@VERIZON.NET>
SENT: 27 MAY 2022 19:37
TO: SCIENTIFIC DEPT <SCIENTIFIC.DEPT@OIE.INT>
SUBJECT: RE: OIE 89TH SESSION
I CAN'T SEEM TO GET A REPLY?
THURSDAY, MARCH 31, 2022
EFSA ONE Conference 2022 Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE PrP of Cervid and Zoonosis Zoonotic Transmission Singeltary Submission
EFSA ONE Conference 2022 Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE PrP of Cervid and Zoonosis Zoonotic Transmission Singeltary Submission
Saturday, April 9, 2022
EFSA EU Request for a scientific opinion on the monitoring of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) EFSA-Q-2022-00114 M-2022-00040 Singeltary Submission
Subject: EFSA EU Request for a scientific opinion on the monitoring of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) EFSA-Q-2022-00114 M-2022-00040 Singeltary Submission
TUESDAY, MARCH 29, 2022
OIE Agent causing chronic wasting disease (CWD) TSE Prion of Cervid
OIE Agent causing chronic wasting disease (CWD) Tue, Mar 29, 2022 4:12 pm
OIE Global Conference on Wildlife Animal Health and Biodiversity - Preparing for the Future (TSE AND PRIONS) Paris (France), 23-25 February 2011
Transmission of prion infectivity from CWD-infected macaque tissues to rodent models demonstrates the zoonotic potential of chronic wasting disease.
Samia Hannaouia, Ginny Chenga, Wiebke Wemheuerb, Walter J. Schulz-Schaefferb, Sabine Gilcha, and Hermann M. Schätzla
aDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine & Hotchkiss Brain Institute; University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; bInstitute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Aims: Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a prion disease of cervids. Its rapid geographic expansion, shedding of infectivity and persistence in the environment for many years are of concern for humans. Here, we provide the first evidence by transmission experiments to different transgenic mouse models and bank voles that Cynomolgus macaques inoculated via different routes with CWD-positive cervid tissues harbor infectious prions that elicit clinical disease in rodents.
Material and Methods: We used tissue materials from macaques inoculated with CWD to inoculate transgenic mice overexpressing cervid PrPC followed by transmission into bank voles. We used RT-QuIC, immunoblot and PET blot analysis to assess brains, spinal cords, and tissues of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) for the presence of prions.
Results: Our results show that of the macaque materials that induced clinical disease in transgenic mice,73% were from the CNS (46% spinal cord and 27% brain), and 27% were from the spleen, although attack rates were low around 20%. Clinical mice did not display PK-resistant PrPSc (PrPres) in immunoblot, but showed low-levels of prion seeding activity. Transmission into bank voles from clinical transgenic mice led to a 100% attack rate with typical PrPres signature in immunoblot, which was different from that of voles inoculated directly with CWD or scrapie prions. High-level prion seeding activity in brain and spinal cord and PrPres deposition in the brain were present. Remarkably, we also found prion seeding activity in GIT tissues of inoculated voles. Second passage in bank voles led to a 100% attack rate in voles inoculated with brain, spinal cord and small intestine material from first round animals, with PrPres in immunoblot, prion seeding activity, and PrPres deposition in the brain. Shortened survival times indicate adaptation in the new host. This also shows that prions detected in GIT tissues are infectious and transmissible. Transmission of brain material from sick voles back to cervidized mice revealed transmission in these mice with a 100% attack rate, and interestingly, with different biochemical signature and distribution in the brain.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that macaques, considered the best model for the zoonotic potential of prions, were infected upon CWD challenge, including oral one. The disease manifested as atypical in macaques and transgenic mice, but with infectivity present at all times, as unveiled in the bank vole model with an unusual tissue tropism.
Funded by: The National Institutes of Health, USA, and the Alberta Prion Research Institute/Alberta Innovates Canada.
Grant number: 1R01NS121016-01; 201,600,023
Acknowledgement: We thank Umberto Agrimi, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy, and Michael Beekes, Robert-Koch Institute Berlin, Germany, for providing the bank vole model. We thank the University of Calgary animal facility staff and Dr. Stephanie Anderson for animal care.
Transmission of Cervid Prions to Humanized Mice Demonstrates the Zoonotic Potential of CWD
Samia Hannaouia, Irina Zemlyankinaa, Sheng Chun Changa, Maria Immaculata Arifina, Vincent Béringueb, Debbie McKenziec, Hermann M. Schatzla, and Sabine Gilcha
aDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; Hotchkiss Brain Institute; University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; bUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UVSQ, VIM, Jouy-en-Josas, France; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Aims: Chronic wasting disease (CWD), a prion disease of cervids, spreads efficiently among wild and farmed animals. Potential transmission to humans of CWD is a growing concern due to its increasing prevalence. Here, we aimed to determine the zoonotic potential of CWD using a mouse model for human prion diseases.
Material and Methods: Transgenic mice overexpressing human PrPC homozygous for methionine at codon 129 (tg650) were inoculated intracerebrally with brain homogenates of white-tailed deer infected with Wisc-1/CWD1 or 116AG CWD strains. Mice were monitored for clinical signs and were euthanized at terminal disease. Brains were tested by RT-QuIC, western blot upon PK digestion, and immunohistochemistry; fecal homogenates were analyzed by RT-QuIC. Brain/spinal cord and fecal homogenates of CWD-inoculated tg650 mice were inoculated into tg650 mice or bank voles. Brain homogenates of bank voles inoculated with fecal homogenates of CWD-infected tg650 mice were used for second passage in bank voles.
Results: Here, we provide the strongest evidence supporting the zoonotic potential of CWD prions, and their possible phenotype in humans. Inoculation of mice expressing human PrPC with deer CWD isolates (strains Wisc-1 and 116AG) resulted in atypical clinical manifestations in > 75% of the mice, with myoclonus as leading clinical sign. Most of tg650 brain homogenates were positive for seeding activity in RT-QuIC. Clinical disease and presentation was transmissible to tg650 mice and bank voles. Intriguingly, protease-resistant PrP in the brain of tg650 mice resembled that found in a familial human prion disease and was transmissible upon passage. Abnormal PrP aggregates upon infection with Wisc-1 were detectable in thalamus, hypothalamus, and midbrain/pons regions.
Unprecedented in human prion disease, feces of CWD-inoculated tg650 mice harbored prion seeding activity and infectious prions, as shown by inoculation of bank voles and tg650 with fecal homogenates.
Conclusions: This is the first evidence that CWD can infect humans and cause disease with a distinctive clinical presentation, signature, and tropism, which might be transmissible between humans while current diagnostic assays might fail to detect it. These findings have major implications for public health and CWD-management.
Funded by: We are grateful for financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, Genome Canada, and the Alberta Prion Research Institute. SG is supported by the Canada Research Chairs program.
Acknowledgement: We thank Dr. Trent Bollinger, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, for providing brain tissue from the WTD-116AG isolate, Dr. Stéphane Haïk, ICM, Paris, France, for providing brain tissue from vCJD and sCJD cases, and Dr. Umberto Agrimi, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy, for the bank vole model. We thank animal facility staff for animal care, Dr. Stephanie Anderson for veterinary oversight, and Yo-Ching Cheng for preparing recombinant PrP substrates. Thank you to Dr. Stephanie Booth and Jennifer Myskiw, Public Health Agency of Canada, Canada.
Specified Risk Materials DOCKET NUMBER Docket No. FSIS-2022-0027 Singeltary Submission Attachment
https://downloads.regulations.gov/FSIS-2022-0027-0002/attachment_1.pdf
Sunday, January 10, 2021APHIS Concurrence With OIE Risk Designation for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy [Docket No. APHIS-2018-0087] Singeltary Submission June 17, 2019APHIS Concurrence With OIE Risk Designation for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy [Docket No. APHIS-2018-0087] Singeltary SubmissionGreetings APHIS et al,I would kindly like to comment on APHIS Concurrence With OIE Risk Designation for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy [Docket No. APHIS-2018-0087], and my comments are as follows, with the latest peer review and transmission studies as references of evidence.THE OIE/USDA BSE Minimal Risk Region MRR is nothing more than free pass to import and export the Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE Prion disease. December 2003, when the USDA et al lost it's supposedly 'GOLD CARD' ie BSE FREE STATUS (that was based on nothing more than not looking and not finding BSE), once the USA lost it's gold card BSE Free status, the USDA OIE et al worked hard and fast to change the BSE Geographical Risk Statuses i.e. the BSE GBR's, and replaced it with the BSE MRR policy, the legal tool to trade mad cow type disease TSE Prion Globally. The USA is doing just what the UK did, when they shipped mad cow disease around the world, except with the BSE MRR policy, it's now legal.Also, the whole concept of the BSE MRR policy is based on a false pretense, that atypical BSE is not transmissible, and that only typical c-BSE is transmissible via feed. This notion that atypical BSE TSE Prion is an old age cow disease that is not infectious is absolutely false, there is NO science to show this, and on the contrary, we now know that atypical BSE will transmit by ORAL ROUTES, but even much more concerning now, recent science has shown that Chronic Wasting Disease CWD TSE Prion in deer and elk which is rampant with no stopping is sight in the USA, and Scrapie TSE Prion in sheep and goat, will transmit to PIGS by oral routes, this is our worst nightmare, showing even more risk factors for the USA FDA PART 589 TSE PRION FEED ban.The FDA PART 589 TSE PRION FEED ban has failed terribly bad, and is still failing, since August 1997. there is tonnage and tonnage of banned potential mad cow feed that went into commerce, and still is, with one decade, 10 YEARS, post August 1997 FDA PART 589 TSE PRION FEED ban, 2007, with 10,000,000 POUNDS, with REASON, Products manufactured from bulk feed containing blood meal that was cross contaminated with prohibited meat and bone meal and the labeling did not bear cautionary BSE statement. you can see all these feed ban warning letters and tonnage of mad cow feed in commerce, year after year, that is not accessible on the internet anymore like it use to be, you can see history of the FDA failure August 1997 FDA PART 589 TSE PRION FEED ban here, but remember this, we have a new outbreak of TSE Prion disease in a new livestock species, the camel, and this too is very worrisome.WITH the OIE and the USDA et al weakening the global TSE prion surveillance, by not classifying the atypical Scrapie as TSE Prion disease, and the notion that they want to do the same thing with typical scrapie and atypical BSE, it's just not scientific.WE MUST abolish the BSE MRR policy, go back to the BSE GBR risk assessments by country, and enhance them to include all strains of TSE Prion disease in all species. With Chronic Wasting CWD TSE Prion disease spreading in Europe, now including, Norway, Finland, Sweden, also in Korea, Canada and the USA, and the TSE Prion in Camels, the fact the the USA is feeding potentially CWD, Scrapie, BSE, typical and atypical, to other animals, and shipping both this feed and or live animals or even grains around the globe, potentially exposed or infected with the TSE Prion. this APHIS Concurrence With OIE Risk Designation for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy [Docket No. APHIS-2018-0087], under it's present definition, does NOT show the true risk of the TSE Prion in any country. as i said, it's nothing more than a legal tool to trade the TSE Prion around the globe, nothing but ink on paper.AS long as the BSE MRR policy stays in effect, TSE Prion disease will continued to be bought and sold as food for both humans and animals around the globe, and the future ramifications from friendly fire there from, i.e. iatrogenic exposure and transmission there from from all of the above, should not be underestimated. ...
APHIS Indemnity Regulations [Docket No. APHIS-2021-0010] RIN 0579-AE65 Singeltary Comment SubmissionComment from Singeltary Sr., TerryPosted by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service on Sep 8, 2022Comments on technical aspects of the risk assessment were then submitted to FSIS.Comments were received from Food and Water Watch, Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT), Farm Sanctuary, R-CALF USA, Linda A Detwiler, and Terry S. Singeltary.This document provides itemized replies to the public comments received on the 2005 updated Harvard BSE risk assessment. Please bear the following points in mind:Owens, Julie From: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [flounder9@verizon.net]Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:09 PM To: FSIS RegulationsCommentsSubject: [Docket No. FSIS-2006-0011] FSIS Harvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Page 1 of 98 8/3/2006Greetings FSIS, I would kindly like to comment on the following ;Suppressed peer review of Harvard study October 31, 2002.October 31, 2002 Review of the Evaluation of the Potential for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in the United States Conducted by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health and Center for Computational Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University Final Report Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Office of Public Health and Science Prepared by RTI Health, Social, and Economics Research Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 RTI Project Number 07182.024FULL TEXT OF GOA REPORT BELOW (takes a while to load)2. Mad Cow Disease: Improvements in the Animal Feed Ban and Other Regulatory Areas Would Strengthen U.S. Prevention Efforts. GAO-02-183, January 25.SATURDAY, AUGUST 16, 2008Qualitative Analysis of BSE Risk Factors in the United States February 13, 2000 at 3:37 pm PST (BSE red book)FULL TEXT OF GOA REPORT BELOW (takes a while to load)2. Mad Cow Disease: Improvements in the Animal Feed Ban and Other Regulatory Areas Would Strengthen U.S. Prevention Efforts. GAO-02-183, January 25.8 hr BSE confirmation turnaround took 7+ months to confirm this case, so the BSE MRR policy could be put into place. ...TSS-------- Original Message --------Subject: re-USDA's surveillance plan for BSE aka mad cow diseaseDate: Mon, 02 May 2005 16:59:07 -0500From: "Terry S. Singeltary Sr."Greetings Honorable Paul Feeney, Keith Arnold, and William Busbyet al at OIG, ...............snip...There will be several more emails of my research to follow. I respectfully request a full inquiry into the cover-up of TSEs in the United States of America over the past 30 years. I would be happy to testify...Thank you, I am sincerely, Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box , Bacliff, Texas USA 77518 xxx xxx xxxxDate: June 14, 2005 at 1:46 pm PSTIn Reply to:Re: Transcript Ag. Secretary Mike Johanns and Dr. John Clifford, Regarding further analysis of BSE Inconclusive Test Resultsposted by TSS on June 13, 2005 at 7:33 pm:Secretary of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman resigns Nov 15 2004, three days later inclusive Mad Cow is announced. June 7th 2005 Bill Hawks Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs resigns. Three days later same mad cow found in November turns out to be positive. Both resignation are unexpected. just pondering... TSS*** 2009 UPDATE ON ALABAMA AND TEXAS MAD COWS 2005 and 2006 ***Suppressed peer review of Harvard study October 31, 2002October 31, 2002Review of the Evaluation of the Potential for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in the United States Conducted by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health and Center for Computational Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee UniversityFinal ReportHarvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Update; Notice of Availability and Technical MeetingOwens, JulieFrom: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [flounder9@verizon.net]Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:09 PMTo: FSIS RegulationsCommentsSubject: [Docket No. FSIS-2006-0011] FSIS Harvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)Response to Public Comments on the Harvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Update,October 31, 2005INTRODUCTIONThe United States Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) held a public meeting on July 25, 2006 in Washington, D.C. to present findings from the Harvard Risk Assessment of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Update, October 31, 2005 (report and model located on the FSIS website: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Science/Risk_Assessments/index.asp). Comments on technical aspects of the risk assessment were then submitted to FSIS. Comments were received from Food and Water Watch, Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT), Farm Sanctuary, RCALF USA, Linda A Detwiler, and Terry S. Singeltary. This document provides itemized replies to the public comments received on the 2005 updated Harvard BSE risk assessment. Please bear the following points in mind:03-025IFA03-025IFA-2Terry S. SingeltaryFrom: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [flounder9@verizon.net]Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 6:17 PMTo: fsis.regulationscomments@fsis.usda.govSubject: [Docket No. 03-025IFA] FSIS Prohibition of the Use of Specified Risk Materials for Human Food and Requirements for the Disposition of Non-Ambulatory Disabled CattleONE final comment tonight, i just cannot take anymore. well, ill just let the facts speak for themselves, no need to even comment ;Section 2. Testing Protocols and Quality Assurance ControlsIn November 2004, USDA announced that its rapid screening test, Bio-Rad Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), produced an inconclusive BSE test result as part of its enhanced BSE surveillance program. The ELISA rapid screening test performed at a BSE contract laboratory produced three high positive reactive results.40 As required,41 the contract laboratory forwarded the inconclusive sample to the APHIS National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) for confirmatory testing. NVSL repeated the ELISA testing and again produced three high positive reactive results.42 In accordance with its established protocol, NVSL ran its confirmatory test, an immunohistochemistry (IHC) test, which was interpreted as negative for BSE. In addition, NVSL performed a histological43 examination of the tissue and did not detect lesions44 consistent with BSE.Faced with conflicting results, NVSL scientists recommended additional testing to resolve the discrepancy but APHIS headquarters officials concluded no further testing was necessary because testing protocols were followed. In our discussions with APHIS officials, they justified their decision not to do additional testing because the IHC is internationally recognized as the "gold standard." Also, they believed that conducting additional tests would undermine confidence in USDA’s established testing protocols.full text 130 pages ;PDF]Freas, William TSS SUBMISSIONFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Page 1. J Freas, William From: Sent: To: Subject: Terry S. Singeltary Sr. [flounder@wt.net] Monday, January 08,200l 3:03 PM freas ... http://web.archive.org/web/20170301223601/https://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/AC/01/slides/3681s2_09.pdfWEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2022USDA Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE, Scrapie, CWD, Testing and Surveillance 2022 A Review of History
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2022House and Senate Send Important Chronic Wasting Disease Legislation to President’s Desk